Blog

Traditional Filament Winding vs. Robotic Winding: The Future of Carbon Fiber Manufacturing

👁 Reads: 131

Several sectors have seen a revolution thanks to carbon fiber's great strength, cheap weight, and resistance to environmental conditions. Carbon fiber sheets and other custom carbon fiber products with an outstanding strength-to-weight ratio are made from these fibers. Carbon fiber products are used in a variety of industries, including medical devices, sports equipment, aerospace, and automotive, due to their exceptional durability and performance. Effective manufacturing techniques are becoming more and more necessary as the market for carbon fiber products expands. Two well-known processes for creating customized carbon fiber products are robotic winding and traditional filament winding, each with unique benefits and drawbacks. We will examine these two methods in-depth in this blog article, looking at their variations, uses, and prospects for the production of carbon fiber.

Traditional Filament Winding

This technique has been widely applied in many industries, ranging from the production of small pipes to massive aircraft fuselage sections. It originated from ancient lathe mechanisms and braiding notions. An established method for fabricating composites, traditional filament winding entails winding fibers coated with resin around a revolving mandrel to form non-axisymmetric or cylindrical structures. This process works especially well for making hollow, cylindrical objects like tanks, pressure vessels, and pipes. It is possible can modify the winding pattern to satisfy particular performance and strength requirements. Precise winding circumstances, including location and angle, are essential to the operation. These conditions are managed by a system that rectifies discrepancies between the reference shape and the actual shape of the winding item. The winding angles determine the mechanical properties of the part, while the tension of the tows during winding affects the density of the laminate. To ensure the quality of the filament winding, systems incorporate features like tension sensors for straight filament alignment and filament detection units for monitoring the winding lamination state. Compared to robotic winding, traditional filament winding is a low-tech process with limitations in handling complex shapes and offering precision and control. However, it is a cost-effective method for mass-producing simple composite parts.

Robotic Winding

A cutting-edge technique called robotic filament winding makes use of industrial robots to produce intricately shaped structural components. It uses a delivery system to wind continuous fibers impregnated with resin over a spinning mandrel. This process is more accurate and efficient than conventional approaches. It works well for taping the parts along the stress directions that they encounter while they are operating. For the production of custom carbon fiber products, this technology is perfect since it can handle intricate winding patterns and shapes. The sole method that has been utilized thus far to produce intricately shaped parts is the robotic filament winding cell, which takes the role of the human operator. It represents an advantage as regards process control, repeatability and manufacturing times. Therefore, at present, robotic winding is used for manufacturing parts with complex geometry, even with concave surfaces, but only with a hollow section. While filament winding is not typically used for flat carbon fiber sheets, advancements in robotic technology have enabled the production of complex shapes and patterns that can be utilized in the creation of carbon fiber sheets and other flat components. For the feasibility of parts with concavity, the adopted solution is to stratify the coils of fiber in a direction transverse to the local curvature, to avoid fiber bridging, which occurs in the presence of concavities and consists in the formation of bridges by the fibers not adherent to the mandrel shape.

Traditional vs Robotic Filament Winding

Precision - Robotic filament winding offers superior precision due to automated control, repeatability, and advanced monitoring systems. However, traditional filament winding, while flexible, is more prone to variability and less consistent in precision due to reliance on manual adjustments and operator skill.

Efficiency - Robotic filament winding offers greater efficiency through faster production speeds, reduced labour requirements, and high suitability for large-scale manufacturing. Traditional filament winding, while quicker to set up for small batches and custom jobs, is less efficient overall due to slower production rates and higher reliance on skilled labour.

Customization - Both traditional and robotic winding techniques are employed in the creation of custom carbon fiber products. Traditional filament winding excels in customization due to its flexibility, ability to handle complex designs, and adaptability to various materials without extensive reprogramming. Robotic filament winding, while requiring initial detailed programming, offers high precision and consistency for custom designs, making it suitable for repetitive custom orders but less flexible for one-off or highly variable designs.

Maintenance - Traditional filament winding has lower initial maintenance costs and simpler maintenance routines that can be handled by standard machine operators, though it may require frequent adjustments. Robotic filament winding, while requiring specialized technicians and potentially higher initial maintenance costs, benefits from advanced diagnostics and less frequent maintenance needs, leading to longer-term efficiency.

Cost - Traditional filament winding has a lower initial cost but incurs higher operational costs due to labour and maintenance, making it less suitable for large-scale production. Robotic filament winding requires a significant initial investment but offers lower operational costs and greater efficiency, making it more cost-effective for large-scale and repetitive production.

For a wide range of carbon fiber products, including automotive parts, aerospace components, and sports equipment, both traditional and robotic winding techniques are utilized. The choice between these methods often depends on the specific requirements of the product, such as the need for high precision, volume of production, and cost considerations.

Conclusion and Future Outlook

In the evolving landscape of carbon fiber manufacturing, both traditional and robotic filament winding have their places. Traditional filament winding is cost-effective and flexible, making it suitable for small to medium-sized production runs and simpler designs. However, it is less efficient and precise compared to robotic winding. Robotic filament winding stands out for large-scale production and highly customized carbon fiber products, offering unmatched precision, efficiency, and consistency. Despite a higher initial investment, the long-term benefits of reduced labour costs, increased production speed, and superior product quality make it a worthwhile investment. As demand for advanced carbon fiber products grows, robotic winding becomes increasingly essential. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into robotic systems promises even greater advancements, optimizing winding patterns, predicting maintenance needs, and enhancing customization capabilities. The future of carbon fiber manufacturing is bright, with robotic winding leading the way towards more efficient, high-quality, and customized solutions. While traditional winding remains relevant for specific needs, the shift towards robotic winding is likely to accelerate, driving innovation and quality in carbon fiber production.

 

Read Our Latest Blogs

Linkedin Whatsapp